How dual-building program transitioned from new construction to retrofit without forcing demolition delays or creating expensive site storage bottlenecks.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit lobortis arcu enim urna adipiscing praesent velit viverra sit semper lorem eu cursus vel hendrerit elementum morbi curabitur etiam nibh justo, lorem aliquet donec sed sit mi dignissim at ante massa mattis.
Vitae congue eu consequat ac felis placerat vestibulum lectus mauris ultrices cursus sit amet dictum sit amet justo donec enim diam porttitor lacus luctus accumsan tortor posuere praesent tristique magna sit amet purus gravida quis blandit turpis.
At risus viverra adipiscing at in tellus integer feugiat nisl pretium fusce id velit ut tortor sagittis orci a scelerisque purus semper eget at lectus urna duis convallis. porta nibh venenatis cras sed felis eget neque laoreet suspendisse interdum consectetur libero id faucibus nisl donec pretium vulputate sapien nec sagittis aliquam nunc lobortis mattis aliquam faucibus purus in.
Nisi quis eleifend quam adipiscing vitae aliquet bibendum enim facilisis gravida neque. Velit euismod in pellentesque massa placerat volutpat lacus laoreet non curabitur gravida odio aenean sed adipiscing diam donec adipiscing tristique risus. amet est placerat.
“Nisi quis eleifend quam adipiscing vitae aliquet bibendum enim facilisis gravida neque velit euismod in pellentesque massa placerat.”
Eget lorem dolor sed viverra ipsum nunc aliquet bibendum felis donec et odio pellentesque diam volutpat commodo sed egestas aliquam sem fringilla ut morbi tincidunt augue interdum velit euismod eu tincidunt tortor aliquam nulla facilisi aenean sed adipiscing diam donec adipiscing ut lectus arcu bibendum at varius vel pharetra nibh venenatis cras sed felis eget.
New construction follows predictable sequences—but retrofit doesn't wait for replacement panels to arrive before demolition crews start stripping facades. This dual-building program required fundamentally different tracking logic: sequential workflows for new construction, independent stage updates for retrofit. Learn how flexible workflow configuration kept both programs moving without artificial constraints.
AICA new construction completed first, followed by ICAB retrofit requiring completely different tracking approach. AICA's sequential fabrication-to-installation workflow couldn't apply to ICAB where existing facade dismantling happened independently of replacement panel readiness across 50 building segments.
Existing ICAB envelope needed stripping across 50 segments independent of whether replacement panels were fabricated or delivered. Sequential workflow logic would force artificial dependencies, delaying demolition unnecessarily, compressing installation windows, and creating expensive site storage of replacement panels awaiting access.
Managing two buildings with different process requirements through separate tracking systems risked creating coordination gaps and version conflicts. Updates to one building's schedule often impacted the other, but dependencies would only surface in delayed status meetings when correction opportunities had passed.
First building ran a sequential 6-stage workflow where completing later stages auto-updated earlier ones. Second used non-sequential 7-stage with independent dismantling—demolition and delivery could proceed in parallel without artificial dependencies.
Teams could track progress across both buildings sequentially or drill into specific segments independently by scope, phase, or type, without switching systems or losing the portfolio view throughout the program.
Centralized tracking eliminated version conflicts between new construction and retrofit teams, giving management unified visibility into both building programs without reconciling separate systems or delayed status reconciliation.
When the first building wrapped and the second ramped up, tracking continued without resetting systems or retraining teams. Each building kept its own workflow logic throughout, with distinct process requirements and without manual workarounds.
Non-sequential dismantling tracking let demolition crews proceed independently of replacement panel delivery, maximizing schedule efficiency by eliminating artificial waiting periods, preventing double-handling of stored materials, and compressing overall retrofit timeline.
With unified dashboard showing both building programs and models, resource conflicts surfaced weeks before they'd cause rework or acceleration costs, and not during the program transition when those conflicts usually happen and when options are limited.
Sequential logic works for new construction—but retrofit needs flexibility. This program proved that different building types can coexist in unified tracking without forcing artificial dependencies. Demolition proceeded when ready, deliveries arrived when needed, and both programs stayed visible in one dashboard. When your portfolio includes diverse project types, workflow flexibility isn't optional.